Miracles

"As for witches, I think not that their witchcraft is any real power; but yet that they are justly punished, for the false belief that they have that they can do such mischief, joined with their purpose to do it if they can; their trade being nearer to a new religion than to a craft or science." - Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651)

"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it Endeavors to establish... When anyone tells me that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself, whether it be more probable that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact, which he relates, should really have happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and according to the superiority, which I discover, I pronounce my decision, and always reject the greater miracle. If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous than the event which he relates; then, and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion." - David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748)

"We have never seen, in our time, nature go out of her course; but we have good reason to believe that millions of lies have been told in the same time; it is therefore, at least millions to one, that the reporter of a miracle tells a lie. The story of the whale swallowing Jonah, though a whale is large enough to do it, borders greatly on the marvelous; but it would have approached nearer to the idea of a miracle, if Jonah had swallowed the whale." - Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

###

The Klass Curse


"No matter how long you live, you will never know any more about UFOs than you know today. You will never know any more about what UFOs really are, or where they come from. You will never know any more about what the U.S. Government really knows about UFOs than you know today. As you lie on your own death-bed you will be as mystified about UFOs as you are today. And you will remember this curse." - Philip Klass, 1983

###

Astronomical Phenomena

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

PLANETS

ROUEN INCIDENT, 1916

The General Ignorance of Astronomy.
Venus, Jupiter, and the Zeppelins.

NOTE. The following item translated by Dr. Clifford C. Crump from a paper by Camille Flammarion in L' Astronomie for March 1916 shows the lack of astronomical knowledge, lamented in the preceding paper by E. F. Bigelow, to be more or less general. [EDITORS].

Since I published in the New York Herald a chart on which I marked with circles from west to east, the positions of the planets visible in our beautiful winter sky so handsomely starred, I have received the following letter:

     We are here at Rouen, three zealous readers of the New York Herald, and also members of the "Societé Astronomique de France," we meet almost every day at the "Place Boieldieu" and we love to talk about astronomy. Not long since while looking at your celestial chart we saw at once that your numbers 1 and 2, at the side of the chart, and to the west, represented Venus and Jupiter, which were very near each other on the night of the thirteenth and fourteenth. They also represented, without doubt, the lights of the Zeppelin which alarmed our beautiful city of Rouen Saturday evening.
     In fact, the rumor was current here that this aeriel apparition had been seen to arrive from Harve, brilliant from the south west, without any one being able to distinguish its form or hear its motor. Many eyes followed this double lighted flyer down to the horizon: two lights, forward and aft, until it disappeared at eight fifteen in the western haze without having caused any damage, or having thrown a single bomb.
     The most amusing part of the story is that at Rouen the alarm was complete As soon as the "enemy's fires" had been noticed, a shot from the cannon was fired as a warning, the fireman patroled the streets shouting "On guard!", and an hour later "Back to your quarters." All the danger had passed: Venus and Jupiter had set before the eyes of the citizens of Rouen.

     Since the beginning of the war, there has passed scarcely a month without our Bulletin having discovered analogous confusion, and notably for four months, thousands of ignorant people have taken Jupiter for a dirigible. The position of the double luminary on the southwest horizon, the time of its appearance and disappearance, the apparent path of this aerial ship with head-light (Venus) and aft-light (Jupiter), all contribute to show us that many people are living on our earth in utter ignorance of astronomy, without knowing where they are, and without surmising the marvels of the universe.
     They had at Rouen exactly the same talk as at Paris in the "Place de l'Etoile," "Place de la Concorde," at Montmartre, and in other places in France as we have already mentioned.
     Among a hundred citizens there is scarcely one who ever forms an idea of astronomic realities. The multitude have eyes which do not see. The Chaldean shepherds and the contemporaries of Homer lived better, in truth, than we, and in closer touch with nature. Where is progress?
- Flammarion, Popular Astronomy, Vol. 24, 1916, p.335

Ruppelt, 1960:

"Few people I ever talked to, once they had decided they were looking at a UFO, stopped to calmly say to themselves, 'Now couldn't this be a balloon, star, planet, or something else explainable?'
     In one instance I traveled halfway across the United States to investigate a report made by a high ranking man in the State Department. An experienced observer. It was evening by the time I got to talk to him and after he'd excitedly told me all the pertinent facts, how this bright light had 'jumped across the sky,' he said, 'Want to see it? It's still there but it's not jumping now.'
     We went outside and there was Jupiter."
- Ruppelt, Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, 1960 Edition

Cincinatti, 1957: the Air Force analyzed this film of a "hovering orb" which turned out to be the moon.

Corpus Christi 1959. Venus was the star of one of the earliest flying saucer films.

Condon Report, 1969:

Unfettered imaginations, triggered into action by the view of an ordinary object under conditions which made it appear to be extraordinary, caused reports of UFOs having such impressive features that our field teams investigated. Such a case was [Project Blue Book case number] 15 [South Mountain, AZ, 1967], in which the observer reported evening observations of a green light as large as a two-story building, sometimes round and sometimes oblong, which landed several times per week 5-20 mi. to the west of his house. He reported having seen through binoculars two rows of windows on a dome-shaped object that seemed to have jets firing from the bottom and that lit up a very large surrounding area. The motion was always a very gradual descent to the western horizon, where the object would "land" and shortly thereafter "cut off its lights." Our investigators found this gentleman watching the planet Venus, then about 15 degrees above the western horizon. He agreed that the light now looked like a planet...
     Light diffusion and scintillation effects (see Section VI, Chapter 4) were also responsible for early morning UFO observations, and Venus was again most frequently the unknowing culprit. Case 37 [Portage County, Ohio, 1966], as initialy reported to us, was a particularly exciting event, for not only had numerous law enforcement officers in neighboring communities observed, chased, and been chased by an UFO of impressive description, but, according to the report, the pilot of a smal aircraft sent aloft to chase the UFO had watched it rise from the swamp and fly directly away from him at such speed that he was unable to gain on it in the chase. Both the light plane and the unidentified object, according to the initial report, were observed on the local Air Traffic Control radar screen. According to the descriptions, the object displayed various and changing colors and shapes. Appearing as big as the moon in the sky, it once stopped about 500 ft. above a police car, lighting up the surroundings so brightly that the officers inside the car could read their wrist watches. As indicated in the detailed report of this case, supporting aspects of the main sighting report fell apart one by one as they were investigated, leaving us again pointing to Venus and finding the law enforcement officers surprised that she could be seen at mid-day near the position in the sky their UFO had taken after the early morning chase.

- Edward Condon, Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, 1968

"On one of our space flights, Michael Collins, during one of his extra-vehicular activities, saw Venus rising as the sun was about to come up and thought it was his target satellite - asked the ground if the satellite was off in that direction and later on, of course, found out it wasn't a satellite: it was Venus. There has been even a case where a man, before the UFO phenomenon began - a train conductor - backed his train off the tracks because Venus was coming down the track at him; he thought it was an oncoming train. So the misperception of Venus is a very common thing and doesn't imply that people are not sober or honest or clear-sighted. It implies that they're human." - James Oberg, from a 1980s UFO Documentary

Air Canada, 2011:

Indian Army, 2013:

Scottish police, 2021:


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

■ METEORS

"People are still puzzled very much by a very bright meteor. Even trained pilots. We had cases where commecial pilots have swerved their airplanes thinking they were on a head-on collision course with something that turned out to be a very bright meteor 100 miles away or so." - J. Alan Hyneck, WJR radio interview, 1977

"Everyone is an experienced observer as long as what he sees is familiar to him. As soon as he sees something unfamiliar it's a UFO.
     "Pilots probably come as close to falling into this category as anyone since they do spend a lot of time looking around the sky. But even those who can rattle off the names and locations of stars, planets and constellations don't know about a few relatively rare astronomical phenomena.
     "The bolide, or super meteor, is a good example. Few pilots have ever, or will ever, see a deluxe model bolide but when they do they'll never forget it. It's like someone shooting a flare in front of your face. There are a number of reports of bolides in the Blue Book files and each pilot who made each report called each bolide a UFO. The descriptions are almost identical to the classic descriptions of bolides found in astronomy books.
     "...If most people realized that meteors can have a flat trajectory, they can go from horizon to horizon, they can travel in "formation" (groups), and they can be seen in daylight (as "large silver discs"), the work of UFO investigators would be lighter." - Edward Ruppelt, Do They Or Don't They?, 1960

Bolide over the Roman Republic, 73 BCE, as depicted in The Augsburg Book of Miracles, c.1552

Jackson Lake, Wyoming, 1972.

In 2023, this meteor caused a media stir when a 16-year-old boy claimed it was a flying saucer which crashed near his Las Vegas backyard where giant space monsters were seen lurking in the shadows. George Knapp of 8 News Now was quick to exploit the story and it soon gained national headlines.

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

■ COMETS

Oumuamua.

3I/ATLAS.

###

Rainier Incident, 1947


June 24, 1947. Kenneth Arnold, a fire extinguisher salesman from Idaho, was flying over Mt. Rainier in Washington, searching for a missing WWII aircraft and hoping to collect a reward. Suddenly, while flying from west to east, Arnold spotted 9 airborne objects traveling from north to south in reverse echelon formation - with the leader at the top. At first, he assumed it was a flock of geese, then reasoned that they were too big to be geese, so they must be planes, roughly the size of DC-9's, but without discernable wings or tails aside from a sort of triangular shape on one of the objects (second to last). He described them as shiny and silvery, reflecting the afternoon sun with dazzling brilliance. They flipped like a fish or the tail of a box kite, he said, estimating their speed at between 1,200 and 1,700 miles per hour. Arnold admitted he "could be wrong" about the speed of the objects.

"They were shaped like saucers and were so thin I could barely see them..." Kenneth Arnold, June 25, 1947

"[I]t seemed everybody around the airfield was listening to the story of my experience. I mentioned the speed I had calculated but assured everybody that I was positive that my mathematics were lousy." - Kenneth Arnold, The Coming of the Saucers, 1952

Scientists weigh in:

"I think a lot of the reports are phony...To judge height and speed, even trained observers must know the size of an object." - Wagner Schlesinger, director, Adler Planetarium, Chicago, 1947

"The first skyhooks [high altitude research balloons] were sent up in 1947, the year flying saucers were first reported. Arnold's original description of what he saw above the Cascade Mountains tallies remarkably well with what he would be expected to see had he flown near a group of smaller plastic balloons often used in place of the single large one. He estimated their size as smaller than a plane and the distance as about twenty-five miles or twice the length of Manhattan Island. At this distance they would have been mere specks in the sky, and since Arnold was seeing them with unaided eyes, we cannot trust his guesses as to their actual size, shape, distance, or speed. Estimates of speed presuppose accurate knowledge of distance, and this in turn cannot be gauged unless the exact size is known." - Martin Gardner, Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (1952)

"[Arnold’s] description showed some inconsistencies that made it difficult to decide what the nine disks really were. If they had actually been forty-five or fifty feet long, they must have been much closer than he thought; objects that size would not have been visible at a distance of twenty to twenty-five miles. However, if the estimated distance was correct, then in order to be visible the objects must have been much larger, at least 210 feet long. One of the estimates must be wrong—but which one? Until that question was settled, the computed speed was meaningless, since to estimate the velocity of a moving object an observer must know either its true distance or its true size. Even after a careful study, Air Force investigators could not identify the disks; they might have been clouds, a mirage, or some kind of aircraft, but no definite answer was possible from the evidence available." - Donald Menzel, The World of Flying Saucers (1963)

"[Kenneth Arnold] stated that [the] objects seemed about 20 times as long as wide, estimating them as 40-50 ft long.
     He also estimated the distance as 20-25 miles and clocked them as going 47 miles in 102 seconds (1700 mph).
     If the distance were correct, then in order for details to be seen, objects must have been of the order of 100 x 2000 ft in size.
     If we adopt a reasonable size, Arnold's own estimate, in fact, of 50 ft long, hence about 3 ft wide, the objects must have been closer than a mile, obviously contrary to his statement.
     If we adopt a reasonable limiting size of the objects of 20 x 400 ft, objects must have been closer than 6 miles to have shown the detail indicated by Arnold. At this distance, angular speed observed corresponds to a maximum speed of 400 mph.
     In all probably, therefore, objects were much closer than thought and moving at definitely sub-sonic speeds." - J. Allen Hyneck, The Hyneck Report (1977).

Our conclusion:

Based on Arnold's description, and factoring his size/distance/speed miscalculations (illustrated by Hyneck) into the equation, as well as the parallax illusion of increased speed caused by both the objects and the observation platform (Arnold's plane) being in motion, the "discs" possess characteristics consistent with a balloon-borne weather device or atmospheric research payload with three or more radar targets:

• Bright metallic silver
• No sound
• No wings
• No tail, only a convex "v" shape
• Flying in a reverse echelon formation
• Weaving, dipping, skipping, skimming
• Flipping like fish or the tail of a box kite
• Reflecting bright flashes as they flipped

There should be little doubt that these - the very first flying saucers - were, indeed, components of a weather balloon.

Had the press described Arnold's sighting as "flying silver box kites" instead of "flying saucers," the public - or at least the weather bureau - might have quickly deduced that weather balloons were the culprit. They could have announced the roll-out of the newest weather devices, particularly the shiny, silvery, kite-like, radar/wind target, or "rawin," made famous two weeks later when an Army intelligence officer at Roswell, New Mexico, hastily identified a crashed rawin as a "flying disk." In a way, of course, the officer was 100% correct: the rawin and the flying disc were one and the same from the very beginning.

Project Mogul balloon launch, Alamagordo, NM, July 1947.

Four "flying discs" over Morristown, NJ, July 1947. The witness who took this photo described the topmost object as being a dull greyish-white while the other three appeared to be bright metallic silver. The objects ascended and drifted southward until, from his vantage point, they quickly disappeared. A personal note: after reading scores of descriptions of June/July 1947 objects which sounded like weather balloons, the Morristown report was like a Rosetta stone, helping to unravel the saucer mystery: unlike all the others, this one was accompanied by a photograph (c/o Blocher report, 1967) which appears to show a weather balloon with three radar targets. However, the Morristown objects remain officially "unsolved" in the files of Project Blue Book.

Meanwhile Arnold's objects were reckoned by the experts to be either birds or mirages. Arnold took great umbrage at the latter suggestion as he thought it implied he was insane. His credibility as a witness to something extraordinary is somewhat degraded if he is unclear about the objective nature of mirages. It suffers further damage when he aligns himself with Ray Palmer, co-author and promoter of the Shaver Mystery hoax, and Fred Crisman, inventer of the Maury Island hoax. In less than a month, Arnold's credibility was squandered. The saucers vanished from the headlines for a time. They returned after three years heraldic by new saucer celebrities:

Donald Keyhoe, whose 1950 book accused the U.S. government of covering up knowledge of extraterrestrial visitors.

Frank Scully, whose 1950 book disclosed secret knowledge of a crashed saucer and dead aliens (later exposed as a hoax).

Ray Dimmick, another crashed saucer/dead aliens claimant who captured headlines in the spring of 1950 before admitting to fabricating the story.

###

(c) 2023, R. A. Henning
Center For IFO Studies

UFO Cover-ups

Plan 9 From Outer Space (1959)

"Although I listen to hundreds of stories and a lot of allegations, I found no hard evidence that the government is deliberately repressing information about UFOs. I think that a lot of what is attributed to a repression of information, or the suppression of information, is reduced to just simple bureaucratic ineptness and red tape." - Brad Aires, CUFOS, UFO Encounters LP, 1978

"After looking at the [Roswell crash] material [on the Foster ranch], I walked over to the military men. They said they were from RAAF and were just looking around to see what they could find. They said they were going back to Roswell and would talk with me further there. They had a very casual attitude and did not seem at all disturbed that the press was there. They made no attempt to run us off." - Jason Kellahin, reporter for The Roswell Daily Record, affidavit, 9/20/1993

"When challenged to supply the real names and backgrounds of his informants, Redfern [Roswell conspiracy author] protests that his publisher's attorneys forbid such disclosure. Though that strains credulity, at the very least, each 'source' should provide an explanation why, especially at their advanced age, they refuse to go public.
     In 1971, military analyst Daniel Ellsberg gave the New York Times 7,000 pages photocopied from top secret Defense Department documents. These papers documented U.S. involvement in Vietnam from 1945 through 1968 and showed that senior government officials, including the President, had systematically lied to the American public about Vietnam. Ellsberg became the object of an FBI manhunt and was charged with 12 felony counts after he gave himself up, but his case was dismissed in 1973 on the grounds of governmental misconduct against him.
     The point is, Ellsberg remained a free man, even having admitted perpetrating a security violation hugely damaging to the executive branch, and in fact became a hero in many quarters, today [2005] holding a prestigious teaching position. When evaluating Redfern's sources one must ask, what are they saying that would result in any retribution at all, 60 years after the fact? And why don't they go to the New York Times with their story, instead of planting it in the quarantined intellectual ghetto of ufology? Ellsberg did not take the Pentagon Papers to Jane Fonda or some minor anti-Vietnam War group. (And of course the same goes equally for the rest of the disinformers, from the MJ-12 hoaxers, to the Alien Autopsy hoaxers, to the 'we have a film of aliens landing at Holloman AFB' hoaxers.)" - Robert Durant, "Doty & the Body Snatchers," International UFO Reporter 30.1 (2005)

"I highly doubt DoD or any other government agency is concealing UFO information. I participated in a comprehensive review of DoD's black programs and spent over a decade conducting oversight of the national foreign intelligence program, an almost totally separate world of secrets. I visited Area 51 and other military, intelligence and research facilities. During all those years, I never detected the faintest hint of government interest or involvement in UFOs... I can think of one lengthy UFO report that is classified only due to concerns over sources and methods. In fact, it identified a convincing conventional explanation for the pilot sightings in this particular case. There are lots of classified documents related to activities at Area 51, where high security is needed. But this is all legitimate stuff the American people would support. They have nothing to do with UFOs, to the best of my knowledge." - Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense; Leslie Kane interview, Huffington Post, 5/9/2016

“There are a lot of rumors out there that [the Nimitz incident] was classified and the ship got locked down. No, it wasn’t. Men in suits did not show up. No one told us not to talk about it" ... "I did not have to be quiet; the superiors knew, everyone on the ship knew...[the story] just kinda went away and I really didn't talk about it for years.” – Commander David Fravor, US Navy; Joe Rogan interview, 10/2019

###

Monster Hoaxes

The 2nd century god, Glycon, was invented by the Greek magician Alexander of Abonoteichus, who fastened a puppet's head to a trained snake and told peoples' fortunes. 

In 1613, the remains of an extinct deinotherium, like this one, were exhibited in Paris as the skeleton of a 25' giant - specifically, king Teutobochus of the Teutons (d. circa 100 BCE).

Lake Fagua monster, 1784. A fabrication.

Great Moon Hoax, 1835. Another fabrication.

Fiji Mermaid, 1842.

"Man from Mars," 1864. French fabrication.

Cardiff giant, 1869.

"Solid Muldoon," 1877.

Taughannock giant, 1879.

Lake George monster, 1904.

New York Times, April 25, 1934:

SEA SERPENT HOAX OF 1904 IS BARED; Mechanical Monster, Created by H.W. Watrous, Nearly Depopulated Lake George.

MANIPULATED BY PULLEY
Artist Thinks Scots Are Using a Similar Device to Play Joke Upon World.

"The story of a sea serpent hoax perpetrated upon the Summer colony at Lake George thirty years ago was revealed yesterday by Harry W. Watrous, 80-year-old president of the National Academy of Design. Mr. Watrous said his revelation was actuated by the many current tales of sea serpents and declared that, in his opinion, the Scots were 'spoofing' the world in like manner with a mechanical monster in Loch Ness in Scotland."

Loch Ness monster, 1934. The hoaxers confessed 60 years later.

Dead Martian, Atlanta GA, 1953: shaved monkey, dyed green & left on a road near saucer-shaped scorch marks (made with a blowtorch).

Patterson-Gimlin sasquatch film, 1967. A modified ape suit.

Billy Meier's "Plejarans" from the Pleiedes, 1981: members of The Golddiggers singing group from The Dean Martin Show.

According to HBO's UFOs: What's Going On (1985), this chicken leg is "what some claim is an actual photo of an ET's arm."

"Guardian" photo, 1991: appears to be a still from a movie or TV show, though it is just as likely to be a self-portrait of the hoaxer.

Alien Autopsy, 1995. Ray Santilli's infamous Roswell hoax.

Frozen Sasquatch, 2008. Just an ape suit on ice.

Atacama skeleton, Chile. Deformed human child presented as a "crashed alien" by Steven Greer, Don Schmitt and Jaime Maussan in 2013. 

Li's dead alien, China, 2015. Made of latex.

Supposed "Roswell alien" is a mummified child. Promoted in 2015 by Jaime Maussan, the George Knapp of Latin America.

"Demon fairy" created from sticks, glue and the remains of a bat. Promoted by Jaime Maussan in 2016.

Fake Nazca "alien mummy," promoted by Maussan in 2017.

"Yaam Nai," Thailand, 2019: art project by Tori Wrånes featuring costumed actors. Not created as a hoax, but widely misrepresented on social media & "cryptid" websites.

Peruvian dolls with human & animal bones, presented as aliens in Mexico in 2023 by prolific hoaxer Jaime Maussan.

###

Nimitz Incident, 2004

The Nimitz incident of November 2004 refers to a number of alleged UFO encounters off the California/Mexico coast, southwest of San Diego & Tijuana. These were, in fact, several unrelated incidents:

1) Strange radar readings on USS Princeton
2) A large submerged object
3) A small white flying "Tic Tac"
4) A flying object captured on infrared video

The encounters were revealed to the public in the December 2017 New York Times article "Glowing Auras and Black Money: The Pentagon's Mysterious UFO Program" by Leslie Kean & Sidney Blumenthal, followed by a televised interview with two US Navy pilots (David Fravor and Alex Dietrich) on 60 Minutes in 2021.

Artist's rendering of the Nimitz objects described by Navy pilots David Fravor, Alex Dietrich & Jim Slaight.

1. The submerged object was a blue whale.

2. The "Tic Tac" was an albatross with dark wings and a large white body.

3. The "ping pong" maneuvers of the "Tic Tac" - described by Fravor - are a flying technique called dynamic soaring. The albatross glides on varying wind gradients above the ocean, dipping between wave crests and launching toward a favored trajectory, all without flapping their enormous wings, allowing them to accelerate with no visible means of propulsion.


4. The "FLIR1" object is a distant airplane. The sudden acceleration at the end of the video is an illusion: the camera merely stops tracking the object.
Fig. 1: FLIR1 video, 2004. There is no reason to believe FLIR1 shows anything exotic, outside of the high probability that it is one of many "drug planes" common to the skies west of Tijuana and San Diego.
Fig. 2: Chilean Navy video, 2014. This "UFO" was positively identified as Iberia Airlines flight IB6830 (Santiago to Madrid) in 2017. 

5. The seemingly hypersonic "objects" which initiated the Nimitz incident were radar anomalies on the USS Princeton, probably caused by ice crystals. The radar was newly installed and needed calibration, after which the hypersonic "objects" disappeared, never to return.

Carl Sagan wrote about this phenomenon year's earlier:

"At least some [UFO] radar reports were due to anomalous propagation - radio waves traveling curved paths due to atmospheric temperature inversions. Traditionally, they were also called radar angels: something that seems to be there but isn't. You could have simultaneous visual and radar sightings without there being any there there." - The Demon Haunted World, 1996

When reflecting sunlight (or any light), ice crystals can create visible light pillars:



NIMITZ WITNESSES


RADAR

According to Captain Red Smith of the USS Princeton, the radar anomalies were ice crystals. This was the Navy's official conclusion.

“The [carrier strike] group was going to be deploying in a few months and there was a bunch of new systems, like the Spy-1 Bravo radar. It was really about getting all the kinks out.” - Petty Officer Gary Voorhis, USS Princeton

“People are acting like the AEGIS [radar system] is infallible. There’s a reason procedures exist to correct ghost tracks; the AEGIS makes mistakes.” - Karson Kammerzell, Chief Technology Officer, USS Princeton

“I was convinced it was some sort of glitch in the [radar] system...I thought it was some sort of a system error or something civilian-related like balloons." - initial reaction of Kevin Day, Operations Specialist Senior Chief, USS Princeton

Day, a longtime fan of the Coast to Coast AM radio show, convinced himself that the radar anomalies were something other than ice crystals - something not of this Earth.

ALBATROSS

Object had "a fuzzy or wavy looking border" - Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight

"It was just like a ping pong ball." - Cmdr. David Fravor

“It behaved in a way that we were surprised, unnerved. It almost didn’t accelerate. It jumped from spot to spot and tumbled around in a way that was unpredictable” - Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich

"It goes from a hover to a pretty aggressive climb. You can’t just start a climb...This thing did it like it was no big deal.” - Fravor

FIVE MINUTES OR A FEW SECONDS?

"Four of us [were] watching this thing for roughly five minutes." - Fravor

"I only had visual of Tic Tac for 8-10 sec from high cover" ... "If I had a full 5 min with it I would have been able to give you a make, model and serial number!" - Dietrich

HYPERSONIC TIC TAC?

Fravor claims his Tic Tac was seen on radar travelling 60 miles in an instant. Dietrich provides a logical explanation: "Either it was supersonic and able to get there super-fast or it dropped off and something else popped up that had the same radar signature."

ALIENS?

“I am in no way implying that it was extraterrestrial or alien technology or anything like that.” - Dietrich

"It's very possible [the military] could have been testing something on us, and that's why I lean towards it being something of ours [more] than I do it being extraterrestrial, is because I've seen them testing; I've participated in testing." - Petty Officer Patrick Hughes, USS Nimitz

[Chad] Underwood has mostly wanted to avoid having his name “attached to the ‘little green men’ crazies that are out there.” - The Intelligencer, 12/19/2019

"It was not from this world." - Fravor

RECALL

“I would like to think everything is accurate as it was when the event happened; but I know I've gotten some details wrong here and there...There are certain parts of the story that I just didn't remember. The only way I know the details is because I've spoken with other people to kinda fill in the blanks to what I know.” - Patrick Hughes

"I want to be careful because we know the science of the mind, the science of the memory, we shouldn’t rely too much on my technical account at this point." - Dietrich

THE ALLEGED COVER-UP

“There are a lot of rumors out there that it was classified and the ship got locked down. No, it wasn’t. Men in suits did not show up. No one told us not to talk about it" ... "I did not have to be quiet; the superiors knew, everyone on the ship knew...[the story] just kinda went away and I really didn't talk about it for years.” – Fravor

Further reading:

I. FRAVOR'S TIC TAC: A WANDERING ALBATROSS

VIDEOS

Albatross soaring

Dynamic soaring of the wandering albatross, the largest seabird in the world

Dynamic soaring: how the wandering albatross can fly for free

Wandering albatross facts

Dynamic soaring: the flight of the albatross

ARTICLES







RESEARCH PAPERS







II. PRINCETON UFO: A RADAR GLITCH












Police radar differs from military radar, but these incidents are still relevant:


III. UNDERWOOD VIDEO: AN AIRPLANE

Is the Nimitz UFO video just a plane?https://youtu.be/s1oTg0kxzDs

Nimitz FLIR1 "tic tac" video - no sudden moves

Caution to all UFO videographers

###